Filed under:

Trick to Square Numbers Near the Multiples of 50

We are expanding upon the mental math trick of Hans Bethe that impressed Richard Feynman in Los Alamos.

By Satyam Ghimire | Date:

Last modified date:

Bit of a background you can skip : In his book, Surely You Are Joking Feynman, physicist Richard Feynman writes how he was impressed with Hans Bethe when he quickly calculated the square of 48 in his head, while they were heading to get a calculator. He then shares the trick.

For numbers near 50

Let's calculate the square of 47, which is 3 smaller than 50. For that, we will need four things:

  1. We first need to memorise the square of 50, which is \(2500\)
  2. Then we need to calculate the difference multiplied by 100, in our case, \(3\times100 = 300\)
  3. Then we subtract this \(300\) from 2500, which gives us \(2200\)
  4. Then we add the square of the difference \(3^2 = 9\) with this 2200, giving us our answer, i.e. \(2200+9 =2209\)

You might have noticed how this works. We are using the basic algebra formula for squaring the difference of two variables. \((x-y)^2 = x^2 - 2xy + y^2\)

In our case, \(x=50\) and \(y=3\), so this formula gives us:$$\begin{align}(50-3)^2&= 50^2 - 2\times50\times3 + 3^2 \\&= 2500 -100\times3 + 9 \\&= 2209\end{align}$$

In this way, we can just say that the square of 46 is 2116, because \(2500-4\times100 + 16 = 2116\).

For numbers slightly greater than 50, let's say 55, we just have to add everything instead of subtracting. So, the square of 54 would be \(2500+500+25 = 3025\).

For numbers near 100

Okay, let's take 106, which is 6 more than 100. For that our formula gives: $$\begin{align}(x + y)^2 &= x^2 + 2xy + y^2 \\x &= 100, \quad y=6 \\\\(100 + 6)^2 &= 100^2 + 2 \times 100 \times 6 + 6^2 \\&=10000 + 12\times100 +36 \\&= 10000 + 1200 +36 \\&= 11236\end{align}$$

Thus, we can generalize. We memorise the square of 100 which is 10000, and then we add (or subtract) the double of the difference times 100, and then at last add the square of the difference.

So, the square of 92 would be: $$\begin{align}(100-8)^2&= 100^2 -2\times8\times100 +8^2 \\&= 10000 -1600+64\\&= 8400 +64\\&=8464\end{align}$$

For numbers near 150

The square of 150 is 22500, and then multiply the difference with 300, and then add (or subtract), and then last add the square of the difference.

For 158, it would be: $$\begin{align}(150+8)^2&=150^2 + 2\times150\times8 +8^2 \\&= 22500 + 300\times8 + 64 \\&= 22500 +2400 +64 \\&= 24900 +64 \\&= 24964\end{align}$$

I know it doesn't look like a trick anymore. But let's do it one last time.

For numbers near 200

Take for example 196: $$\begin{align}(200-4)^2&=200^2 -2\times4\times200 +4^2 \\&= 40000 - 400\times4 + 16 \\&= 40000 -1600 +16 \\&= 38400 + 16 \\&=38416\end{align}$$

Yep, it has ceased being a trick. But maybe with practice, it won't be this hard.

Subscribe to the newsletter?

Share on social medias:


Read also:

Filed under:

Substack promises audience, newsletters, monetization, CMS, and comment section. What more do you need to ditch your own website?

By Satyam Ghimire || Date: 2025 May 23


an image depicting substack vs my website

Every sixth video on my TikTok feed these days is captioned “articles I read instead of doom scrolling”, and it’s a slideshow of Substack screenshots. And as a wannabe writer who is a big fan of collecting tools instead of actual writing, I started researching about this favourite platform of aesthetic TikTokers. It has perks. A medium-like platform with better discoverability. You can even post small snippets (like tweets) with an image, quote, your thoughts, and lure people in to engage. And most importantly, everyone is equal. All creators have yourthing.substack.com domain, a few fonts to choose from, and a similar looking layout.1 No special treatment just because you can pay money.2 And it turns out even Grant Sanderson from 3blue1brown uses Substack these days for blogging and the last blog piece he wrote on his website was 3 years ago.

Substack promises so much: easy discoverability, community and growth, active users who actually love reading and discovering creators, free email newsletters, monetization, comment section, CMS, no code, free hosting, analytics, etc. You can just focus on your writing. It will take care of everything else for you. And yet with all these perks and features, I don’t feel tempted by Substack. I understand it’s not for me. I don’t want to “just write” and “worry about nothing.” I want to weave my own nest, even if I am an amateur. I want the power to customize each pixel to my will. ...continue reading...

Filed under:

We are expanding upon the mental math trick of Hans Bethe that impressed Richard Feynman in Los Alamos.

Date: 2025 May 29

Filed under:

What would Min do in this situation? -> Min wouldn't be in this situation.

Date: 2023 July 17

Filed under:

How can I stand with an ugly man and look in the mirror and meet my eyes and be proud?

Date: 2023 July 17

Filed under:

You have been praying for something like this for many days but thought it was absurd. This is now how the world works.

By Satyam Ghimire || Date: 2023 July 17


a bag full of money

One day when you wake up, you see a suitcase standing on the table beside your bed, and on its side something written, "2 million dollars. As you wished!" You have been praying for something like this for many years but thought it was absurd. This is not how the world works. You live alone. You look at the door. It's closed. The lock is just as you secured it yesterday. You pick up the suitcase and toss it on the bed and open it. There, in fact, is money— notes— bundles of it.

You start counting. It's two million dollars. But this must have come with certain terms and conditions, you worry. You've never been that much of a God-supporting person. On the spectrum, you fall closer to the opposing crowd. So, why you? When there are devotees and people who always pray and offer flowers? It's a mistake and something bad will happen to compensate. Anyway, you decide on 1.5 million dollars for backup. You are keeping it safe. Safe for what? You don't know. ...continue reading...