Filed under:

Reflecting on “The Girl I Knew” By J.D. Salinger

“She wasn’t doing a thing I could see, except standing there, leaning on a balcony railing, holding the Universe together.”

By Satyam Ghimire | Date:

Last modified date:


Also available as a YouTube video.

Twenty two days ago was the last day of my University. I came home and decided to play a little game of memory. So I started looking across my bookmark list.

Links, mostly which I once visited and maybe after reading the first paragraph, decided it would be a crime to read it then, perhaps later when I could give it the right attention, when the weather is warm, and at least in some background music. Not that day, not then.

The rule of the game was to think of exactly when I saved the particular link, how many years ago. During what time of the University.

The list was very long and I went further up and found links I saved before even joining the University, links from 5-6 years ago.

cover of a girl i knew by j.d. salinger
Cover image when the short story was published

A Girl I Knew is a short story written by J.D. Salinger that appeared in Good Housekeeping Magazine in 1948. I read the story because one day I was just randomly searching for the most beautiful lines and paragraphs in literature and came across one such reddit thread.

You may know that quote already.

She wasn’t doing a thing I could see, except standing there, leaning on a balcony railing, holding the Universe together.

I read the story and thought it was good, and it was good that I was reading something, because I wanted to be a writer and I had a low attention span and a brain that demanded quick stimulation with low effort. Stories needed to be quick and to the point, movies needed to be fast and full of action. The filter which disallowed works such as of Dostoyevsky and Ozu, and only allowed content similar to Marvel movies.

I bookmarked the link. I put that quote as my favorite quote on my Facebook profile. I didn't click it again until seven days ago.

It was the first time I read such an eloquent description of someone with so little words. For me, falling in love with Leah was one of the easiest things, as far as movie and book characters are considered. How could you not when she sits, she sat down, she did the only sensible thing with her beautiful hands there was to be done: she placed them on her lap and left them there.

Her polite "sank you" instead of "thank you", her being a sincere daughter to her fazzer instead of father, her singing a song and saying "don't leave wissout me" instead of "without me". Her innocence was too much for the room and the only way to overcome it was to either talk of it or to open the windows.

But the story isn't really about any romance because there isn't. The narrator himself says:

"We just never said anything to each other. Over a period of four months, we have talked for thirty or thirty-five evenings without saying a word," and he even goes far to write that "...if I should go to hell, I'll be given a little inside room...in which all my conversations with Leah will be played back to me, over an amplification system confiscated from Yankee Stadium"

Leah was, totally, just a girl he knew, in the truest meaning of the word "knew". Because maybe, like he writes,

"I consistently hesitated to risk letting the thing we had together deteriorate into a romance. I don't know any more. I used to know, but I lost the knowledge a long time ago. A man can't go along indefinitely carrying around in his pocket a key that doesn't fit anything."

I don't have a girl I knew, like the narrator John. I don't have a city that has turned into a girl. But this story is special to me because I read it when I was just starting out, the time when I had no knowledge of how the future was going to be. And now after being in that future and re-reading it, it has become a totally new story and a relevant one.

Leah was the first person of such beauty and innocence that struck the narrator. And he only knew her, he couldn't embrace her, touch her, spend time with her in a sense that mattered enough. With the metaphor of Leah, I reflect on my childhood and the past time. When everything was simple and pulsing with innocence and beauty. When the sky was much lower, when dreams were alive and seemed achievable, contrary to now, when the world view has crumbled and everything has turned into just a naive and a fading memory.

After John went to Paris, he didn't write back to Leah, although he had assured her. He forgot her. But when the war started in Europe, John started thinking about her. And when he used to see the photos in the newspaper, he used to fiddle here and there, thinking about her. He wasn't the type of person who just sits and does nothing.

He didn't have Leah's address and her married name. He tried to gather the information but there was no link. But eventually, he returned back to Venice, as he had gotten a job in army intelligence. There he went to the same old house, same apartment where he once used to live. He goes again to the window and looks down for a moment at the balcony. Where Leah, now dead, had once stood and held the Universe together.

Leah and her family were burned in an incinerator. She had turned into just a question as such, "Yeah? What was she, a Jew or something?"

A question phrased in such indifference for many. But for John, she was someone important, not important in a way he can show to the world, but important enough by how much gravity the word "knew" can possess.

I too now reflect on my days in the University, my days in school and college. Places where I grew up. The continuous education that started when I was 4 years old has officially ended. And with it ended the only link to my childhood, except the fact that I am the same person. I am growing old and distant. Time is passing swiftly, blurring each memory. Like John at the end, I am also standing where I used to, and looking at places where once something I knew stood, something which once was very alive and innocent, something which was holding the Universe together.






Share on social medias:


Read also:

Filed under:

Substack promises audience, newsletters, monetization, CMS, and comment section. What more do you need to ditch your own website?

By Satyam Ghimire || Date: 2025 May 23


an image depicting substack vs my website

Every sixth video on my TikTok feed these days is captioned “articles I read instead of doom scrolling”, and it’s a slideshow of Substack screenshots. And as a wannabe writer who is a big fan of collecting tools instead of actual writing, I started researching about this favourite platform of aesthetic TikTokers. It has perks. A medium-like platform with better discoverability. You can even post small snippets (like tweets) with an image, quote, your thoughts, and lure people in to engage. And most importantly, everyone is equal. All creators have yourthing.substack.com domain, a few fonts to choose from, and a similar looking layout.1 No special treatment just because you can pay money.2 And it turns out even Grant Sanderson from 3blue1brown uses Substack these days for blogging and the last blog piece he wrote on his website was 3 years ago.

Substack promises so much: easy discoverability, community and growth, active users who actually love reading and discovering creators, free email newsletters, monetization, comment section, CMS, no code, free hosting, analytics, etc. You can just focus on your writing. It will take care of everything else for you. And yet with all these perks and features, I don’t feel tempted by Substack. I understand it’s not for me. I don’t want to “just write” and “worry about nothing.” I want to weave my own nest, even if I am an amateur. I want the power to customize each pixel to my will. ...continue reading...

Filed under:

Companies are okay with you just importing numpy as np, but you must write the code to implement LRU cache in notepad during interviews.

Date: 2025 June 28

Filed under:

Instagram and TikTok users don’t wanna leave their app. They are not made for clicking, they are made for scrolling.

Date: 2025 June 11

Filed under:

The scene also reminds me of a quote by F. Scott Fitzgerald, "The loneliest moment in someone's life is when they are watching their world fall apart and all they can do is stare blankly." Tanuki are alone. And they can only stare.

Date: 2024 April 30

Filed under:

How can I stand with an ugly man and look in the mirror and meet my eyes and be proud?

By Satyam Ghimire || Date: 2023 July 17


painting of a beautiful girl

I am a beautiful girl. I am a smart girl. I know there's a more popular phrase for this, a phrase that, according to many, should be a compliment to girls like me. But I hate it. I think only fools say it and wearing this stupid compliment is itself a disgrace to its literal meaning (if it even has one). And no, this isn't a cheap attempt to drive sympathy towards me in any way. Give your sympathy to the real ugly. They need it more. Go and say that the inside is what matters.

That beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. There could be a grand total of zero beholder for their beauty, but beauty of course is always in the eyes of the beholder. Never anywhere else. I am confused these days. Not that this is my first time discovering beauty doesn’t always promise peace. These days I don’t care. I don’t feel my qualities. I still have this face though, a face with symmetry of the twilight, hair as soft and flowing as underwater algae, eyes of a leopard, and body as prosperous as some fluffy clouds. These perfections are just here in me, but I am not them. ...continue reading...

Forrest Gump sitting on a bench
Filed under:

I guess most people hate it because it got the best of both worlds: won several Oscars and made a lot of money. And in the same year, The Shawshank Redemption and Pulp Fiction were also released.


By Satyam Ghimire | Date: 2024 September 29

Also available as a YouTube video.